Features, Security, Technology

Exclusive interview: Rakesh Ragudharan, Vice President, Strategic Initiatives, Bahwan CyberTek

Anita Joseph spoke to Rakesh Ragudharan, Vice President, Strategic Initiatives, Bahwan CyberTek, on how a hybrid security approach blends the familiarity of on-premises security with the innovation of the cloud. 

How has the traditional approach to cybersecurity evolved in recent years, and what factors have driven the need for a hybrid security approach?  

The rapid pace of digital transformation has been a pivotal-point for the cybersecurity landscape and this transformation has brought about the emergence of a hybrid security approach. As businesses increasingly adopt cloud services, IoT devices, and mobile technologies, the traditional perimeter-based security model has become less effective. The perimeter is no longer confined to physical boundaries; it’s everywhere these technologies touch. This has led to a realisation that a solely perimeter-centric approach leaves vulnerabilities that can be exploited by cyber adversaries. Besides, the rise in sophisticated cyber threats has prompted organisations to adopt a more dynamic and adaptable stance. Traditional security measures often struggled to keep up with the evolving tactics of threat actors.  

 The frequency and complexity of attacks like ransomware, zero-day exploits, and advanced persistent threats have pushed businesses to seek a more versatile strategy that can swiftly respond to changing threat landscapes. A cyberattack occurs roughly every 39 seconds with cybercrime rates having increased by 300% since the COVID-19 pandemic. According to Cybersecurity Ventures, the cost of cybercrime is predicted to hit $8 trillion in 2023 and will grow to $10.5 trillion by 2025. 

 The concept of a hybrid security approach emerges from the need to bridge the gap between prevention and detection. It’s all about combining proactive measures with robust detection and response capabilities. This strategy involves not only fortifying the perimeter with firewalls and intrusion prevention systems, but also integrating advanced threat intelligence, behavior analytics, and AI-driven anomaly detection, to identify unusual activities within the network. The modern workforce’s inclination towards remote and mobile work has added another layer of complexity. With employees accessing company resources from various locations and devices, a one-size-fits-all security approach no longer suffices. A hybrid model recognises the importance of securing data and applications regardless of their location or the devices used to access them.  

Bahwan CyberTek (BCT) understands this reality extensively. Leveraging our expertise in product engineering, we have developed an advanced Managed Security Services and Threat Intelligence Platform. This platform not only addresses present-day threats but also empowers organisations to proactively outpace cybercriminals. Through its robust implementation of ‘intelligent threat hunting and investigation’ coupled with automated incident response, we enable businesses to maintain security stride-for-stride with the ever-changing landscape of cybercrime. This guarantees their safety and future readiness. In essence, the hybrid security approach acknowledges that while preventing threats is crucial, it’s equally vital to swiftly detect and respond to any breach that does occur. It’s about creating a resilient cybersecurity ecosystem that can adapt to evolving threats and provide a multi-faceted defense. 

In what ways does a hybrid security approach leverage both on-premises and cloud-based solutions to enhance overall protection?  

A hybrid security approach is like the best of both worlds in the realm of cybersecurity. At BCT, we firmly believe in the power of combining on-premises and cloud-based solutions to create a robust shield against evolving cyber threats. Think of it as a dynamic dance between two partners – your on-premises infrastructure and the cloud.  

On-premises solutions provide that tangible, localised control over sensitive data and critical applications. They are the stalwarts guarding your castle walls. You’re in charge here, and that sense of ownership can be reassuring, especially for highly regulated industries. On the other hand, cloud-based solutions bring an agility that’s hard to match. The cloud offers unparalleled scalability and accessibility. It’s like having additional reinforcements that can adapt to different threat scenarios. This flexibility is a game-changer, especially in today’s landscape where the perimeter of your network is constantly shifting. 

So, how does this hybrid dance play out? Imagine a scenario where sensitive customer data resides within your on-premises database, but the processing and analysis of that data happen in the cloud. This way, you’re minimising exposure while still enjoying the computational muscle of the cloud. Additionally, a hybrid approach allows you to cherry-pick the best security tools from both worlds. You can leverage your tried-and-true on-premises solutions, while also tapping into the specialised expertise of cloud providers. The key is in seamless orchestration between your on-premises and cloud security measures. This often involves robust identity and access management, encrypted communication channels, and continuous monitoring to detect any odd moves on the dance floor. In a nutshell, a hybrid security approach blends the familiarity of on-premises security with the innovation of the cloud. It’s about adapting to the ever-changing threat landscape while maintaining control over your most critical assets.  

Can you provide examples of industries or sectors where a hybrid security approach has proven to be particularly effective? What lessons can other sectors learn from these examples?  

 Absolutely. What’s really compelling about the hybrid security approach is its adaptability to various scenarios, which truly emphasises its significance in tackling diverse security challenges. One sector that stands out is the financial industry. Financial institutions have successfully implemented a hybrid security model that combines traditional perimeter defenses with advanced analytics and AI-driven threat detection. By doing so, they’ve managed to reinforce their networks against both known and emerging threats. This approach allows them to safeguard sensitive customer data while also staying agile in the face of rapidly evolving cyber threats. 

 Another sector that has embraced the hybrid security approach is healthcare. The healthcare industry deals with a vast amount of sensitive patient information, making it an attractive target for cybercriminals. By integrating robust perimeter defenses with user behavior analytics and real-time monitoring, healthcare organisations can proactively identify and respond to potential breaches. This not only protects patient data but also ensures the continuous availability of critical medical services.  

 Based on lessons learnt from these and other industries, BCT would suggest that it is essential to acknowledge there is no singular security solution that acts as a perfect remedy. Achieving a complete security stance involves blending various technologies, procedures, and human proficiency. Even though conventional security elements such as firewalls and antivirus programs hold significant importance, they must be enhanced by state-of-the-art innovations like AI and machine learning. These advanced technologies serve anomaly identification and predictive analysis purposes. The collaboration among IT groups, security professionals, and business divisions is of utmost significance. Particularly within the financial and healthcare domains, this collaboration has facilitated the attainment of a more thorough grasp of the threat environment, leading to the formulation of tailored security approaches. 

 It is also important to note that continuous improvement and adaptability is key. Cyber threats are dynamic and ever-evolving, so an effective hybrid security approach should be flexible enough to adjust to new attack vectors and vulnerabilities as they arise. Regular assessments, penetration testing, and staying updated on the latest threat intelligence are essential practices. 

 From our experience and multiple industry examples, there are several key takeaways that other sectors can benefit from: 

  • Customisation: Tailor your hybrid approach to your sector’s unique security requirements, data sensitivity, and compliance needs. There’s no universal solution. 
  • Balance: Strike the right equilibrium between on-premises control and cloud-based innovation. Different functions have varying needs. 
  • Data Classification: Clearly categorise data based on sensitivity and regulatory mandates. Decide what data belongs in the cloud and what should remain on-premises. 
  • Collaboration: Foster collaboration between on-premises and cloud security teams. A cohesive strategy amplifies overall security efforts. 
  • Continuous Monitoring and Response: Embed continuous monitoring and incident response capabilities across both environments to ensure swift threat identification and mitigation. 
  • Holistic Approach: Approach security holistically, considering digital assets as well as physical infrastructure. Comprehensive security covers the entire ecosystem. 

 Some argue that a hybrid security approach could lead to increased complexity. How can organizations manage this complexity while maintaining a strong security posture?  

This is a pertinent question, and I appreciate the opportunity to shed some light on it. First off, it’s crucial to acknowledge that a hybrid environment inherently introduces a certain level of complexity due to the coexistence of diverse infrastructures. But complexity doesn’t have to equate to vulnerability. In fact, with the right strategies in place, it can lead to enhanced security resilience. One of the keystones here is centralised visibility and control. Organisations should invest in robust security management tools that offer a unified view of their entire environment, whether it’s in the cloud, on-premises, or somewhere in between. This centralised approach allows security teams to detect threats, monitor activities, and enforce policies consistently across the board. It’s like having a single pair of eyes that can spot any suspicious activity, regardless of where it occurs. 

 Additionally, automation and orchestration play pivotal roles in simplifying complex security tasks. This has been incredibly showcased by our Threat Intelligence Planform, which integrates big data analytics, intelligent threat hunting, threat incident investigations, automated incident response, and user experience behavioural analysis (UEBA). It is a vital tool for empowering businesses to anticipate and prepare for the continuously evolving future. Designed with interconnected and personalised features, the platform caters to users across all levels of operation – be it strategic, operational, or tactical – Reducing complexity and providing support through automated L1 and L2 tasks, effectively minimising resource expenditure attributed to human errors and concurrently enhancing the precision and performance of threat detection. 

 By automating routine processes such as patch management, vulnerability assessments, and incident response, organisations can alleviate the burden on their security teams and ensure that critical actions are taken promptly and consistently. This not only boosts efficiency but also minimises the risk of human error. Now, I’d be careless not to emphasise the importance of employee training and awareness. As the hybrid environment introduces new tools and procedures, it’s imperative that everyone — from IT personnel to end-users — understands their role in maintaining security. Regular training sessions and awareness programs can go a long way in mitigating risks arising from human factors. 

 In terms of vendor partnerships, organisations should opt for security solutions that seamlessly integrate with their hybrid architecture. This reduces the friction of managing multiple tools and platforms and enables streamlined security operations. Lastly, it’s all about embracing a risk-based approach. Not all assets are equal, and not all threats pose the same level of danger. By conducting thorough risk assessments, organisations can prioritise their efforts on protecting the most critical assets. This way, they can allocate their resources more efficiently and effectively. It’s about finding the right equilibrium between innovation and protection, and that’s where the true strength of a hybrid security approach lies. 

What are the potential cost implications of implementing a hybrid security approach? Is the investment justified by the level of protection it offers?  

The financial implications of embracing a hybrid security approach can be deconstructed into several fundamental components. The initial capital outlay entails procuring and setting up a combination of hardware, software, and services tailored for both on-premises and cloud infrastructures. Though this initial expense might appear substantial, it lays the foundation for a robust security stance. The subsequent consolidation and deployment of various security utilities might demand extra resources and time. However, the strengthening of security oversight could ultimately yield financial savings. Nevertheless, effectively managing a hybrid model necessitates a proficient team well-versed in both on-premises and cloud security methodologies, potentially resulting in training costs or augmented salaries. Nevertheless, this investment enhances the team’s skills and readiness. Added to this, ongoing operational expenditures, encompassing licensing, upkeep, enhancements, and monitoring, can be efficiently controlled over time. Examining the justification of this investment in relation to protection level, a hybrid security approach offers numerous advantages that can be seen as returns on investment.  

 The fusion of on-premises and cloud-based solutions creates a robust defense mechanism covering a wider array of attack vectors. This heightened protection becomes indispensable as the cybersecurity landscape evolves and threats grow more sophisticated. The agility and flexibility intrinsic to a hybrid model empower businesses to swiftly adapt to changing security needs, enabling effective responses to emerging threats and compliance with evolving regulations. Moreover, the investment becomes particularly worthwhile when considering potential costs stemming from data breaches, downtime, and reputational harm. By minimising these risks, a hybrid approach mitigates financial losses and the expenses linked to recovery. 

The hybrid strategy’s role in facilitating regulatory compliance is another factor contributing to its justification. Many industries face stringent regulatory demands, and a hybrid model can aid in meeting these standards, thus avoiding substantial fines and legal consequences. Furthermore, the layered protection inherent to the hybrid approach bolsters business continuity, curbing the financial impact of cyber disruptions. Ultimately, in today’s digital age, the question is not whether you can afford to implement a hybrid security approach, but rather, can you afford not to? The peace of mind and proactive protection it offers align with responsible business practices and the safeguarding of your organisation’s digital future. It’s an investment in resilience, and just like any sound investment, it requires careful consideration but has the potential for substantial returns in terms of mitigating risks and protecting your business in the long run. 

Are there any regulatory or compliance considerations that organisations should be aware of when adopting a hybrid security strategy? How can they navigate these requirements effectively?  

 In today’s intricate regulatory landscape, businesses are often subject to various industry-specific standards and regional data protection laws. Take, for instance, GDPR in Europe or HIPAA in the healthcare sector. When crafting a hybrid security strategy, organisations must ensure that their approach aligns with these regulations across all operational fronts – both on-premises and in the cloud. 

First and foremost, a comprehensive assessment of the organization’s regulatory requirements is essential. Identifying the specific laws and standards that apply to your industry and geographical reach will lay the foundation for your hybrid security approach. This assessment needs to extend across data handling, storage, and transmission practices, as well as access controls and breach notification procedures. Once the regulatory landscape is understood, the next step is to tailor the hybrid security strategy to encompass these considerations. This involves a fine balance between on-premises infrastructure and cloud services. Encryption and access controls become paramount to safeguard sensitive data. Additionally, robust monitoring and auditing mechanisms need to be in place to ensure compliance is maintained over time. 

Collaboration between IT, legal, and compliance teams is key here. Regular communication ensures that all parties are on the same page and can work together to integrate regulatory requirements seamlessly into the hybrid security strategy. Moreover, staying up-to-date with evolving regulations is critical; these frameworks tend to change, and your hybrid strategy should be flexible enough to adapt. Leveraging industry best practices and frameworks, such as NIST Cybersecurity Framework or ISO 27001, can provide a solid foundation for building a compliant hybrid security approach. These standards offer guidelines that resonate with a wide range of regulatory requirements, making compliance more manageable. 

Finally, the significance of substantial employee training must not be underestimated. The efficacy of any security strategy, whether hybrid or not, greatly hinges on the awareness and collaboration of the staff. Routine training workshops can furnish employees with the expertise needed to manage sensitive data judiciously and identify potential compliance challenges. In essence, while adopting a hybrid security strategy is a forward-looking move, organizations must never lose sight of their regulatory responsibilities. A well-thought-out approach that combines technology, collaboration, and ongoing education will ensure that the benefits of hybrid security are reaped without sacrificing compliance. At Bahwan CyberTek we believe, in the realm of cybersecurity, a proactive and holistic strategy is the true path to success. 

What are the arguments against adopting a hybrid security approach? Are there scenarios where a fully traditional or fully modern approach might still be preferable? 

 In breaking down the concept of a hybrid security approach, this approach combines elements of both traditional and modern security strategies to create a comprehensive defense posture. Traditional methods usually involve well-established practices like firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and network segmentation. On the other hand, modern approaches leverage cutting-edge technologies such as AI-driven threat analytics, behavior-based detection, and cloud-native security tools. One argument against adopting a hybrid approach is the potential complexity it introduces. Managing a combination of older legacy systems alongside the latest tech can indeed be challenging. It might require specialised skill sets and additional training for the security team, which can strain resources. 

Moreover, the integration of diverse security solutions could lead to compatibility issues or gaps in coverage. It’s like combining different puzzle pieces – sometimes they fit perfectly, but other times, you might end up with a few gaps that adversaries could exploit. Now, let’s talk about scenarios where a fully traditional or fully modern approach might still hold value. In industries where compliance regulations dictate specific security measures, a fully traditional approach might be preferred. Industries like healthcare or finance often have stringent requirements that mandate proven, time-tested security practices. 

 On the flip side, industries that are heavily reliant on the agility and scalability of the cloud might lean more toward a fully modern approach. Cloud-native security tools can seamlessly adapt to dynamic environments and provide real-time threat insights that are crucial in today’s rapidly evolving threat landscape. Ultimately, the decision on which approach to take boils down to a business’s unique circumstances. Factors like budget, risk appetite, existing infrastructure, and the nature of the data being protected all play a role. It’s a balancing act – finding the sweet spot that maximises security effectiveness while minimizing operational complexity. 

At Bahwan CyberTek, our approach is always tailored to the specific needs of our clients. We aim to strike the right balance between legacy and innovation, understanding that each organisation’s security journey is unique. The goal is to create a cohesive, adaptive security fabric that guards against both historical and emerging threats. In the grand scheme, the hybrid security approach is a testament to the ever-evolving nature of cybersecurity. It showcases the industry’s willingness to learn from the past while embracing the future. As businesses continue to grapple with this decision, what remains constant is the imperative to stay vigilant, adapt, and always stay one step ahead of the adversaries.  

Previous ArticleNext Article


The free newsletter covering the top industry headlines